Re: NNCP with SP via high-latency links and TCP timeouts

Marek Küthe
2025-01-18T20:49:41Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 900 bytes --]

Thanks for the quick reply!

On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 23:38:20 +0300
Sergey Matveev <stargrave@stargrave•org> wrote:

> Well, 30sec latency is anomalously huge delay for IP-link. Even
> communication with geostationary satellite has less than 1s RTT.
> I can imagine only very buffer-bloated stack, that adds such huge
> latencies.

The latency occurred when I used IP via Meshtastic. Meshtastic itself
uses LoRa (by default in long-fast mode).

> Delay-tolerant networking and all that subject is not about
> workability of online/SP protocol, but about packets lying in
> the spool and having no explicit eviction time, just waiting
> when someone, possibly by using store-and-forward method, with
> removable media, will take them out.

However, as far as I understand it, only the SP supports Perfect
Forward Secrecy (PFS), right?

--
Marek Küthe
m.k@mk16•de
er/ihm he/him

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]