Subject: Re: Announcing gitsync-nncp

From: Sergey Matveev <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 13:41:31 +0300

Greetings!

*** John Goerzen [2021-08-18 11:16]:
>https://github.com/jgoerzen/gitsync-nncp

Impressive! My appreciation!

Just out of curiosity, possibly I read badly and too quickly, possibly I
am not taking in account something, or forget how git works, but: each
remote gitsync-accessible repository is "identified" only by a single
branch in your scheme. Can remote/branch be used instead of a single
branch? Instead of "gitsync-nncp/bob" branch, can there be used
"gitsync-bob" git-remote with possibly several branches in it instead
(and dummy send/fetch URLs)? Git-remote can be considered as a some kind
of a namespace/aggregation of branches (plus some URLs/rules where to
push/fetch it) in my opinion. Or using "git remotes" abstraction brings
more problems and complications? But you won't be limited to the single branch.

-- 
Sergey Matveev (http://www.stargrave.org/)
OpenPGP: CF60 E89A 5923 1E76 E263  6422 AE1A 8109 E498 57EF