public inbox for nncp-devel@lists.stargrave.org
Atom feed
From: Sergey Matveev <stargrave@stargrave•org>
To: nncp-devel@lists.stargrave.org
Subject: Re: Tarballs availability over IPFS
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 13:26:00 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aeIKuO37E9TfKwPD@stargrave.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZd_G1v31YfTnumd@stargrave.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 982 bytes --]
Greetings!
Unfortunately I became disappointed with ipfs (again), because of its
relaying abilities. Shame on me, because I had to check that feature
before trying to use in practice.
I setup an isolated Jail environment with three nodes, where two of them
have restricted connectivity because of firewall. And after dozens of
configuration file changes I still was not able to relay the data
through the intermediate node. According to ipfs/libp2p's documentation
it should solve exactly that problem.
And also it leads to consumption of much (tens of gigabytes) "inactive"
memory on my FreeBSD. Seems that this is because of LevelDB, where
mmap-ed pages are copied from ZFS ARC and cached in that "inactive"
memory. And there is no other storage alternative for non-/blocks.
Making it very resource heavy.
So, getting rid of ipfs installation.
--
Sergey Matveev (http://www.stargrave.org/)
LibrePGP: 12AD 3268 9C66 0D42 6967 FD75 CB82 0563 2107 AD8A
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 265 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-17 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-19 21:22 Tarballs availability over IPFS Sergey Matveev
2026-02-19 23:14 ` John Goerzen
2026-02-20 16:10 ` Sergey Matveev
2026-02-20 10:47 ` Marek Küthe
2026-02-20 18:08 ` Sergey Matveev
2026-04-17 10:26 ` Sergey Matveev [this message]