public inbox for nncp-devel@lists.stargrave.org
Atom feed
From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete•org>
To: "Marek Küthe" <m-k-mailling-list@mk16•de>
Cc: nncp-devel@lists.cypherpunks.su
Subject: Re: NNCP with SP via high-latency links and TCP timeouts
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 19:45:07 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a5bnmva4.fsf@complete.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250118204842.44b287c8@ciel> ("Marek =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=BCthe?= =?utf-8?Q?=22's?= message of "Sat, 18 Jan 2025 20:49:18 +0000")

On Sat, Jan 18 2025, Marek Küthe wrote:

> Thanks for the quick reply!
>
> On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 23:38:20 +0300
> Sergey Matveev <stargrave@stargrave•org> wrote:
>
>> Well, 30sec latency is anomalously huge delay for IP-link. Even
>> communication with geostationary satellite has less than 1s RTT.
>> I can imagine only very buffer-bloated stack, that adds such huge
>> latencies.
>
> The latency occurred when I used IP via Meshtastic. Meshtastic itself
> uses LoRa (by default in long-fast mode).

I would like to learn more about this.  I have dabbled in both LoRa and
Meshtastic.  I haven't tunneled IP over Meshtastic though.

Due to LoRa's very slow bitrate, the overhead for IP packets is
significant and TCP performs quite poorly over it.  See some comments in
my project at https://github.com/jgoerzen/lorapipe about this.

But since you can specify a command to pipe to for the addrs in
nncp.hjson, you can pipe directly over a reliable transport without
involving TCP/IP.  This would have a significant benefot for LoRa.

- John

      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-19  2:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-18 11:15 NNCP with SP via high-latency links and TCP timeouts Marek Küthe
2025-01-18 20:38 ` Sergey Matveev
2025-01-18 20:49   ` Marek Küthe
2025-01-18 20:58     ` Sergey Matveev
2025-01-19  1:45     ` John Goerzen [this message]