public inbox for nncp-devel@lists.stargrave.org
Atom feed
From: Sergey Matveev <stargrave@stargrave•org>
To: nncp-devel@lists.cypherpunks.su
Subject: Re: NNCP with SP via high-latency links and TCP timeouts
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 23:58:24 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z4wV8UH4DUkFrEWz@stargrave.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250118204842.44b287c8@ciel>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 664 bytes --]

*** Marek Küthe [2025-01-18 20:49]:
>The latency occurred when I used IP via Meshtastic. Meshtastic itself
>uses LoRa (by default in long-fast mode).

Ah, I see. Well, currently (except for missing timeout setting in
net.Dial), only OS'es TCP tuning may help with SP.

>However, as far as I understand it, only the SP supports Perfect
>Forward Secrecy (PFS), right?

Yes, it has PFS property, but only for the data transmitted inside
that SP-connection. That means that encrypted packets in the spool
still won't have PFS property anyway.

-- 
Sergey Matveev (http://www.stargrave.org/)
OpenPGP: 12AD 3268 9C66 0D42 6967  FD75 CB82 0563 2107 AD8A

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-18 20:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-18 11:15 NNCP with SP via high-latency links and TCP timeouts Marek Küthe
2025-01-18 20:38 ` Sergey Matveev
2025-01-18 20:49   ` Marek Küthe
2025-01-18 20:58     ` Sergey Matveev [this message]
2025-01-19  1:45     ` John Goerzen