public inbox for nncp-devel@lists.stargrave.org
Atom feed
From: "Marek Küthe" <m-k-mailling-list@mk16•de>
To: nncp-devel@lists.cypherpunks.su
Subject: Re: NNCP with SP via high-latency links and TCP timeouts
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 20:49:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250118204842.44b287c8@ciel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z4wRSgLJHOyfspq7@stargrave.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 900 bytes --]
Thanks for the quick reply!
On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 23:38:20 +0300
Sergey Matveev <stargrave@stargrave•org> wrote:
> Well, 30sec latency is anomalously huge delay for IP-link. Even
> communication with geostationary satellite has less than 1s RTT.
> I can imagine only very buffer-bloated stack, that adds such huge
> latencies.
The latency occurred when I used IP via Meshtastic. Meshtastic itself
uses LoRa (by default in long-fast mode).
> Delay-tolerant networking and all that subject is not about
> workability of online/SP protocol, but about packets lying in
> the spool and having no explicit eviction time, just waiting
> when someone, possibly by using store-and-forward method, with
> removable media, will take them out.
However, as far as I understand it, only the SP supports Perfect
Forward Secrecy (PFS), right?
--
Marek Küthe
m.k@mk16•de
er/ihm he/him
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-18 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-18 11:15 NNCP with SP via high-latency links and TCP timeouts Marek Küthe
2025-01-18 20:38 ` Sergey Matveev
2025-01-18 20:49 ` Marek Küthe [this message]
2025-01-18 20:58 ` Sergey Matveev
2025-01-19 1:45 ` John Goerzen